← All providers

Ozempic vs Oak Longevity

Compare pricing, features, and medications to find the best GLP-1 provider for your weight loss journey

Ozempic vs Oak Longevity: Overview

Choosing between Ozempic and Oak Longevity for GLP-1 weight loss medication? Both are popular providers, but they differ in pricing, medication options, and service features.

Ozempic focuses on semaglutide at $349/month with a rating of 8.9/10. Oak Longevity also provides both semaglutide and tirzepatide at $119/month with a 7.7/10 rating.

The price difference of $230/month is significant - Oak Longevity is the more budget-friendly option, while Ozempic positions itself as a premium service.

Our recommended brand

After reviewing all 92 providers on this platform, we've identified CoreAge Rx as offering the most transparent pricing model. At just $99/month — the same price every month, every dose — there are no surprise charges or hidden fees. Combined with exceptional service quality, personalized support, and access to both semaglutide and tirzepatide, it represents the best value without compromising on care.

Visit CoreAge Rx →Read full review

At a glance

Price Difference

$230/mo

Rating Difference

1.2

Winner

Ozempic

Best For

Quality

Ozempic

View full Ozempic review →

Rating

8.9/10Better

Monthly Price

$349

Medications

semaglutide

Pros

✓FDA-approved for type 2 diabetes
✓Weekly injection
✓Effective for weight loss (~10-15%)
✓Widely available
✓Often covered by insurance for diabetes

Cons

✗Approved for diabetes, not weight loss
✗Requires prescription
✗GI side effects common
✗May be prescribed off-label for weight loss

Oak Longevity

View full Oak Longevity review →

Rating

7.7/10

Monthly Price

$119Cheaper

Medications

semaglutidetirzepatide

Pros

✓Among the lowest advertised prices in the category: compounded semaglutide from $119/month and tirzepatide from $185/month (checked July 27, 2026)
✓One price at every dosage, so titrating up does not increase what you pay
✓Free shipping and free health coaching are included, with no separate membership fee
✓Same-day approval is offered and no video call is required, which suits people who cannot take time out for an appointment
✓Publishes a phone number, an email address and the legal entity behind the brand
✓The compounded explanation distinguishes 'not FDA-approved as finished products' from the ingredients and conditions used, which is more accurate than the blanket claims some rivals make
✓A comparison calculator and a public price comparison table let you check the maths before signing up
✓Cancellation can be done from your own account by cancelling the prescription or deleting the account, rather than only by emailing support

Cons

✗The homepage advertises 'One price · All dosages · No subscriptions', but the terms contain a 'Refund, Shipping, Cancellation Policy' describing how cancelling will 'stop any future subscription renewals or charges'. Those two statements cannot both be right
✗A third price appears in Oak's own comparison table, which lists 'Oak $167/mo' against headline rates of $119 and $185. The table never explains which product $167 refers to
✗'Same Active Ingredient' is used as a feature row comparing Oak to brand-name drugs. That is the precise claim the FDA cited in a February 2026 warning letter to another telehealth firm, on the basis that it implies FDA approval the compounded product does not have
✗Promotions stack confusingly - a 'SUMMER SALE - Save up to 60% vs. retail pricing' banner sits alongside a separate '$200 off new patient offer' with no terms for either
✗Trustpilot carries only 53 reviews, far too few to corroborate the '10,000+ Satisfied Patients' claim
✗There is no dedicated refund policy page; refund terms are buried inside the general Terms of Use
✗The Terms of Use include a dispute resolution and arbitration agreement
✗'Up to 50% cheaper than competitors' is asserted repeatedly in a scrolling banner without naming the competitors or the basis for the figure

Choose Oak Longevity

Feature-by-feature comparison

Feature	Ozempic	Oak Longevity
Monthly Price	$349	$119
Rating	8.9/10	7.7/10
Medications	semaglutide	semaglutide, tirzepatide
Insurance Accepted	Yes	No
Support Hours	Mon-Fri 8AM-8PM ET	Not published
Live Chat	No	No
Free Shipping	No	Yes
Shipping Speed	Varies by pharmacy	Same-day approval claimed; delivery time not published
Mobile App	No	No
Dedicated Coach	Not included	Included
Follow-up Frequency	As prescribed by physician	Free health coaching included
Money-back Guarantee	Savings card available (as low as $25 for eligible patients)	None published; refund terms appear only inside the Terms of Use
Cancellation Policy	Prescription-based, consult doctor	Cancel from your account by cancelling the prescription or deleting the account; charges already processed by a provider are not reversed

Which should you choose?

Choose Ozempic if you:

→Prefer a higher-rated service (8.9/10 vs 7.7/10)
→Need insurance coverage for your treatment
→Value: fda-approved for type 2 diabetes

Get started with Ozempic

Choose Oak Longevity if you:

→Want to save $230/month with a more affordable option
→Want more medication options to choose from
→Want personalized coaching support included
→Value: among the lowest advertised prices in the category: compounded semaglutide from $119/month and tirzepatide from $185/month (checked july 27, 2026)

Get started with Oak Longevity

Website previews

Ozempic

Ozempic website

Oak Longevity

Oak Longevity website

Our recommendation

Ozempic comes out ahead with a higher rating of 8.9/10.

Get started with Ozempic

Related comparisons

Ozempic vs CoreAge Rx

Ozempic vs Zepbound

Ozempic vs Sequence

Ozempic vs Mounjaro

Ozempic vs Wegovy Pill

Ozempic vs Wegovy

Ozempic vs Henry Meds

Ozempic vs Form Health

Ozempic vs Eden

Ozempic vs FuturHealth

Ozempic vs Calibrate

Ozempic vs Ro

Ozempic vs Juniper

Ozempic vs Noom Med

Ozempic vs Hims

Ozempic vs Fella Health

Ozempic vs Ascend Medical

Ozempic vs Outlive Biology

Ozempic vs Sequence

Ozempic vs Sesame Care

Compare other providers

Compare GLP-1 Brands

First Brand

vs

Second Brand